Regarding the composition of Chinese studies Ifangs three questions
Speaking of Chinese school, I first talk about its definition. In the early 20th century, Liang Qichao defined the content of the Chinese academic content,: "Compared to the traditional academic academic of Western academics", consisting of "Shi · Zi · Ji". Later, Chinese studies were also considered by most people as general names of classical culture.
In the new culture movement, the people who study the Chinese studies gradually decreased, and the rise of vernacular texts has caused the disaster of the Chinese Studies Insurance. Fortunately, at the end of the last century, some educators and writers advocated revival of Chinese studies and Chinese studies.
In recent years, Chinese learning has set off a big wave, which people call it "national learning fever". The main participants are children and adolescents.
Today, I was walking on the road, and suddenly I heard the voice of a little girl: "Qing Shunzhi, according to Shenjing. To the 10th Chuan, President Xun. The rude voice of middle -aged women interrupted the little girl: "How many times have you memorized, I don't know! It's Xuantong! Re -memorize it!" This triggered my thinking about Chinese studies.
First of all, can young children understand the complex emotions of the ancients? I heard that some children can recite Wen Tianxiang's "Over -Ding Yang Yang" and "Song of Zhengqi", which are called prodigies. But can he understand the emotions of the great patriotic generals and writers of the Southern Song Dynasty? Even if he could recite "panic beach head and said panic, Zero Dingyang sighed," can he appreciate the helplessness and sadness of Wen Tianxiang? Can he appreciate "who has no death in life since ancient times, and leaves Dan Xin's heart and takes care of it." Chinese Tianxiang Na Dan reports to the country. Therefore, it is meaningless to run a Chinese class in a young age.
Secondly, there are essences and dregs in Chinese studies. Who can guarantee that these children only recite the essence and have no contact with the dross? It is undeniable that there are many classic culture in the 5,000 -year history of China. Of course, there are also a few ideas such as "foolish loyalty" and "foolish filial piety", which runs counter to modern education. Take Guo Ju's buried mother in "Twenty -Four Filial Piety" to give an example: Guo Ju has his mother and young son. When he can't afford them, he must abandon one of them. What if Guo Ju did not find gold? The son was buried by his father. If some children come into contact with this kind of thing, they are unknown, they will definitely leave a mark in their hearts, and they may even be really filial to elders when they grow up. Therefore, learning Chinese studies should learn its essence and abandon its dross.
. Finally, is such a small child who learns Chinese studies for a businessman or to learn knowledge? Nowadays, parents are three or four years old. They only ask them to recite classic characters such as "Thousand Characters" and "Three Character Classics" and other classic characters. As a result, some businessmen seized business opportunities. They propagate the good of Chinese studies. And some people even retro, wear clothes in ancient times, culture in ancient times, do what ancients do, and collect the renminbi. In ancient times, Chinese studies were a science, but now, Chinese studies have become synonymous with the cultural industry. With the words of Chinese studies, enrollment is much easier. Chinese studies seem to be a signboard, a cash cow. Even if these children can recite these classic characters rolling, who can guarantee that they can fully grasp the meaning of these ancient texts? They will only mechanically recite "the beginning of people, sexuality," and Confucian classics. Therefore, most of today's Chinese learning fever is the result of the hype of businessmen.
"Book of Rites" once said that learning should be "learned, interrogative, think carefully, distinguish it, and do it." But what else did Chinese education in modern early childhood education do not only achieve the "Expo Book"? With my foolish opinion, Chinese contemporary early childhood education should "choose their good people and change it. Let children truly cultivate their sentiments and learn something! Faced with the heat waves of the Chinese studies in recent years, we should ask, not only asking for national studies, but also ourselves. The author's observation and thinking are keen. His "three questions" touched such a "root" -whether we can control Chinese studies and make it along a healthy way; Promotion. The author's "three questions" are well -founded. Each question is not groundless, but with actual examples. From personal experience to social reality, from historical cases to group phenomena, each example is combined with dot and face, and the levels are clear, which can indeed explain the problem well. At the same time, the argumentation part is also closely combined with the case, which is targeted. If you want to plant some kinds of flowers suitable for acidic soil, you can only have alkaline soil in the yard. What should I do? Do you improve the soil first, or do you talk about it first? I am afraid that many people can't say whether we are planting flowers or cultivating soil. It can be seen that the author really has caught a critical place.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.